The first several weeks of each legislative session are a flurry of activity – but mostly off the House floor.

Instead, House members sit in their committees and subcommittees debating legislation and holding multiple public hearings to learn more about the legislation before us. House committees held nearly two dozen hearings this week debating everything from restructuring the Department of Transportation to strengthening our Right to Work laws.

The House Ways and Means Committee split into its subcommittees and asked every state agency (or private entity looking for public dollars) to justify its budget requests.

Now, I won’t give you the full “How a Bill Becomes a Law” speech today, but several pieces of important legislation took first steps toward reality this week.

One major piece of legislation that moved this week was a new DOT reform bill that was approved by a House Judiciary Subcommittee.  This legislation eliminates the Department of Transportation Commission, eliminates the Joint Transportation Review Committee and makes the Secretary of Transportation as governing authority for the DOT.

The Secretary of Transportation would be appointed by the Governor and would become a member of the Governor’s cabinet. We began the process of reforming the DOT three years ago, and problems still persist at the agency.

The DOT reform bill is also part of our ongoing effort to streamline and reform our sometimes disjointed state government. Last year, the House approved a number of measures to consolidate agencies under a Department of Administration. The House also approved ballot measures that would give the voters of South Carolina the opportunity to make the state Superintendent of Education appointed by the Governor and to make the Lieutenant Governor appointed by the Governor. All of these bills are currently in the state Senate.

My House colleagues were pleased to hear this week that the Senate followed our lead and approved legislation that reverses the ridiculous decision by the DHEC board to approve the dredging of the Savannah River to benefit the Port of Savannah. The bill will now come back to the House for a procedural vote before going to the Governor’s desk for her signature. The Governor’s spokesman said in a newspaper this week that she will veto the bill. Since the measure passed both chambers unanimously, the bill should be easily overridden.

The legislation reaffirms an existing state law requiring the DHEC Board to gain the approval of the Savannah River Maritime Commission before taking action on any matter pertaining to the navigability, depth, dredging, sludge disposal and other collateral issues in regard to the Savannah River.

One of every five jobs in our state is directly tied to our ports, and overwhelming evidence presented by DHEC scientists showed the dredging would cause irreversible environmental damage.

The House took action this week on two major pieces of legislation to protect our economy and promote future economic growth.

The House unanimously passed a bill to protect our state’s waterways by reaffirming an existing 2007 state law requiring the DHEC Board to gain the approval of the Savannah River Maritime Commission before taking action on any matter pertaining to the navigability, depth, dredging, sludge disposal and other collateral issues in regard to the Savannah River.

We passed this legislation because of concerns over DHEC’s decision to ignore state law by reversing a decision to deny dredging of the Savannah River to a depth of 48 feet. 

One of every five jobs in our state is directly tied to our ports, and this issue was too important to ignore.  Had DHEC followed existing law, this measure would have been unnecessary.  As evidenced by the 111-0 vote, my House colleagues were disappointed when DHEC voted to reverse its decision to deny the Savannah River dredging permit. Overwhelming evidence presented by DHEC scientists showed the dredging would cause irreversible environmental damage. 

Based on those facts alone, DHEC was correct to deny this permit. 

The decision also placed Charleston’s port at a competitive disadvantage and jeopardized the very existence of a future port in Jasper. Both of those ports are critical to our state’s future economic development. The decision also put our taxpayers on the hook for paying a significant portion of Georgia’s port dredging. 

Also this week, the House Republican Caucus, flanked by Chairman Bill Sandifer, Speaker Bobby Harrell, and Governor Haley, unveiled sweeping legislation this week designed to protect the rights of our state’s workers.

The Right to Work Act of 2012 is a central part of the Caucus’s commitment to strengthening our state’s business environment and creating jobs. The bill was pre-filed with the entire Republican Caucus signed on as co-sponsors.

Every South Carolinian should have the right to work and make a living for his or her family without being forced to join a union or pay dues. Union participation should be a matter of choice for any worker, but our workers must be protected from undue coercion or influence by unions or businesses. This legislation strengthens more than a half-dozen parts of our Right to Work Act.

The legislation requires employers to display a poster that informs workers of our state’s Right to Work protections, and clarifies language that the Right to Work must not be denied because of membership, or non-membership, in a labor organization. The legislation also increases labor organization transparency, increases civil penalties for violations, and requires written authorization for any union dues to be deducted from a worker’s paycheck.

The current Administration in Washington is engaged in a direct assault on private businesses locating in our state, as evidenced by action against Boeing and its threats of a lawsuit because we protected our workers’ right to a secret ballot.

This week, we received great news that our state’s unemployment rate has dropped to its lowest rate since 2008. Our Right to Work law is a key part of our future economic development, and one of our most important economic incentives.

The House Republican Caucus is committed to preserving the rights of workers and ensuring minimal outside interference in a business’s affairs. This is an ongoing fight that we take very seriously.

For the past two years, the South Carolina House approved a measure requiring voters to show a picture identification at the polls. The bill finally became law last year.

Wednesday, the director of the S.C. Department of Motor Vehicles testified that – after examining fewer than 10 percent of the state’s registered voters – that as many as 957 dead people are listed as having voted. This is an incredible finding that not only validates the need for the Voter ID law, but also adds more fuel to the argument that the Obama Administration was playing politics when it rejected the law last month.

I’m thinking none of the dead people showed picture ID’s at the polls, and if a cursory check found 957 dead voters, I’d hate to see what the final number is once the other 2 million records are examined.

The Obama Administration rejected the Voter ID law as part of an ongoing crusade against our state. It did this after receiving inaccurate data provided by the S.C. Election Commission and its director, Marci Andino – according to a study by the Associated Press. The Election Commission told the Justice Department that 240,000 registered voters lacked a picture ID. Our DMV, in a feat of nothing more than basic record-checking, found 37,000 voters on the Commission’s list were dead, 334 were registered at the same address, 25 were registered at the Sumter County jail, and an unreported number had Social Security numbers of 000-00-0000 or 999-99-9999.

Under the provisions of our Voter ID law, people in ourstate have to show a state-issued driver’s license or ID card, a military ID or a U.S. passport to vote. In December, the U.S. Justice Department determined the law was discriminatory, said the state had not demonstrated a need for the law.

They found all this, despite approving a similar and more restrictive law in Georgia.

South Carolina’s law even allows someone who does not have a picture ID to sign an affidavit attesting to who they are – something Georgia’s law does not do.

Democrats have repeatedly used the ridiculous assertion that the Republicans are trying to disenfranchise voters. They don’t make the same assertions in Rhode Island, where a heavily Democratic legislature also enacted Voter ID.

South Carolina’s Republicans are simply trying to disenfranchise the dead and those who would maliciously use loopholes in the system to defraud our election system.

Perhaps the Justice Department is comfortable with dead people voting – after all, the dead have been voting in Chicago for decades.

The House Republican Caucus supports Attorney General Alan Wilson’s intention to file a lawsuit against the Justice Department, and we also support his calls for SLED to investigate the DMV’s findings. This is clearly an issue that will go back to the Federal courts, and Voter ID laws have already been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Our democracy will be at its most healthy when we have 100 percent voter participation, and the Republican Caucus firmly believes that.

But when you go to the polls this year, apparently you should check the pulse of the person next to you in line.